CyberTrustWorks — One Platform. Total Trust.

Fussion_GRC domain 3 of 15

Compliance & Regulatory

Map one set of controls to ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIST CSF, DPDP, RBI, PCI DSS and HIPAA, and see readiness for each framework at any time.

Fussion_GRC consumes data from your existing tools. It does not perform security scanning.

The problem

What problem this domain solves

Compliance management maps your internal controls to the requirements of each standard and regulation you must meet, tracks whether each control is working, and shows readiness by framework.

The same control tested three times for three different audits.
New regulations such as the DPDP Act added as yet another spreadsheet.
Readiness only known a few weeks before an audit.
No clear view of which requirement each piece of evidence actually satisfies.

For the CISO

Why this matters to the CISO

Most organisations face several frameworks at once. Testing the same control separately for each one wastes time and causes inconsistent answers. A CISO needs one control set, mapped many ways, with live readiness.

A readiness percentage per framework with the specific gaps that could cause a finding.

How it works

How Fussion_GRC works in this domain

Fussion_GRC consumes data from your existing tools. It does not perform security scanning. It connects to the tools that already hold compliance data, then does the following:

  1. 01Maps one internal control to many framework requirements.
  2. 02Calculates readiness per framework from control status and evidence freshness.
  3. 03Highlights requirements that have no mapped control or no current evidence.
  4. 04Tracks regulatory changes and shows which controls they affect.

Data in

Exactly where the data comes from

Source toolData receivedTypical sync
Framework libraryISO 27001:2022, SOC 2, NIST CSF 2.0, DPDP, RBI, PCI DSS, HIPAA requirementsUpdated when standards change
Cloud posture tools (AWS, Azure, GCP)Configuration checks mapped to controlsEvery 4–24 hours
Identity and endpoint toolsMFA coverage, device compliance, access reviewsDaily
Evidence moduleUploaded and automatically collected evidenceReal time

Typical frequencies; exact intervals depend on each tool's API limits and your configuration. Connector availability varies — see integrations.

Data flow

From your tools to the boardroom

Your existing tools
Framework library
Cloud posture tools (AWS, Azure, GCP)
Identity and endpoint tools
Evidence module
Fussion_GRC
  1. 1. Framework requirements
  2. 2. Fussion_GRC
  3. 3. Control mapping
  4. 4. Evidence
  5. 5. Readiness score
  6. 6. Audit pack
Outputs
Controls & evidence
Risk updates
Owner workflows
Executive reporting
Fussion_GRC consumes data from your existing tools. It does not perform security scanning.

Automation

Automation and workflows

Workflows created

  • New framework adopted → gap analysis → control mapping → remediation
  • Control test due → owner notified → evidence submitted → reviewer approves
  • Regulatory change → impact assessment → control updates

Actions for leaders

  • Close gaps for an upcoming audit
  • Approve the Statement of Applicability
  • Review controls affected by a regulatory change

Controls & evidence

Controls and evidence

Controls are defined once and mapped across frameworks. See supported frameworks.

Controls

  • Control library mapped to all applicable frameworks
  • Periodic control testing schedule
  • Regulatory change review
  • Statement of Applicability kept current

Evidence generated

  • Framework mapping export
  • Control test results with dates
  • Statement of Applicability
  • Regulatory change log

AI assistance

How Fussion AI helps

Answers come from your own Fussion_GRC data, with sources. Learn about Fussion AI.

Questions you can ask

  • "Are we ready for our ISO 27001 audit?"
  • "Which DPDP Act requirements have no mapped control?"
  • "Show me controls that satisfy both SOC 2 and ISO 27001."
Fussion AIIllustrative
Are we ready for our ISO 27001 audit?
Based on the latest data from Framework library and Cloud posture tools (AWS, Azure, GCP), here is what needs attention:
  • The same control tested three times for three different audits.
  • New regulations such as the DPDP Act added as yet another spreadsheet.
  • Readiness only known a few weeks before an audit.

Every point links to its source record. Recommendation only — a named owner approves decisions.

Dashboard

Dashboard example

Roles

Who uses this domain

CISO

Most organisations face several frameworks at once. Testing the same control separately for each one wastes time and causes inconsistent answers. A CISO needs one control set, mapped many ways, with live readiness.

CIO

Sees how compliance affects IT services, investment priorities and the systems the business depends on.

Security Manager

Runs day-to-day compliance operations from one queue instead of separate tool consoles.

GRC Manager

Maps compliance controls to frameworks, tracks evidence freshness and prepares audits.

Control Owner

The controls they test, when tests are due and which evidence is missing.

Auditor

A requirement-to-control-to-evidence trail for every framework in scope.

Technical Owner

Receives specific, prioritised tasks in Jira or ServiceNow with the context needed to fix them.

Executive

A readiness percentage per framework with the specific gaps that could cause a finding.

Integrations

Tools you can connect

  • AWS
  • Microsoft Azure
  • Google Cloud
  • Microsoft Entra ID
  • Okta
  • Intune
  • Jira

Named tools show typical sources; availability may be planned, roadmap or custom connector. Confirm during a demo.

See all integrations

Outcomes

Business outcomes

A readiness percentage per framework with the specific gaps that could cause a finding.
A requirement-to-control-to-evidence trail for every framework in scope.
The controls they test, when tests are due and which evidence is missing.
Less manual effort: 4 processing steps and 3 workflows run automatically instead of in spreadsheets.

Example

Example workflow

  1. 1
    System

    New signal from Framework library

  2. 2
    Fussion_GRC

    Maps one internal control to many framework requirements.

  3. 3
    Control owner

    New framework adopted → gap analysis → control mapping → remediation

  4. 4
    GRC manager

    Evidence attached: Framework mapping export

  5. 5
    CISO

    Close gaps for an upcoming audit

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which frameworks are supported?

ISO 27001:2022, SOC 2, NIST CSF 2.0, India's DPDP Act, RBI cybersecurity guidance, PCI DSS and HIPAA, plus custom internal frameworks.

Does using Fussion_GRC mean we pass the audit?

No tool guarantees certification. Fussion_GRC shows readiness and organises evidence; your auditor still makes the judgement.

Does Fussion_GRC scan our environment?

Fussion_GRC consumes data from your existing tools. It does not perform security scanning.